Generous Blood Transfusions Not Beneficial for Some With Burst Brain Aneurysms

You May Be Interested In:7 Signs It’s Time to Take Your Memory Problems Seriously


For people with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and anemia, there was no significant neurological benefit from getting red blood cell transfusions more liberally, the SAHARA randomized trial showed.

Between a liberal transfusion strategy (mandatory transfusion at a hemoglobin cutoff of ≤10 g/dL) and a restrictive strategy (optional transfusion at a hemoglobin level of ≤8 g/dL), an unfavorable neurological outcome was similarly likely at 12 months (33.5% vs 37.7%, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.72-1.09).

Administered during the critical care period for people hospitalized for an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, liberal and restrictive strategies were also associated with no different rates of adverse events and other secondary outcomes:

  • Functional independence at 12 months (per Functional Independence Measure scale): 82.8 vs 79.8 points
  • Quality of life (QoL; per EuroQol five-dimension, five-level utility index): 0.5 in both groups
  • Health status or QoL (per visual analog scale): 52.1 vs 50 points
  • Mortality at 12 months: 27.2% vs 27.1% (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.77-1.28)

Researchers led by Shane English, MD, of Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ontario, reported the SAHARA findings in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The best threshold for blood transfusions remains controversial in critically ill patients — existing guidelines only offering “vague recommendations to maintain hemoglobin levels within the normal range or to transfuse in the case of anemia,” according to English’s team.

While a liberal transfusion strategy might improve oxygen delivery and reduce brain tissue hypoxia, it has the potential downsides of increasing complications and mortality.

In this summer’s HEMOTION trial report, compared to an even stricter restrictive approach (transfusion at a hemoglobin level of ≤7 g/dL), a SAHARA-type liberal blood transfusion strategy failed to reduce the risk of an unfavorable neurologic outcome at 6 months when applied to critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury and anemia.

Soon afterward, however, the TRAIN trial results came out favoring a liberal strategy (hemoglobin cutoff

The SAHARA authors pointed out important differences among these studies, namely the choice of scale for neurologic function, patient populations included, and thresholds set to define liberal versus restrictive blood transfusion.

English and colleagues reported that in their trial, the liberal transfusion arm had gotten a median 2 units of red cells versus 0 units in the restrictive group. Median pretransfusion hemoglobin was 9.6 g/dL and 7.6 g/dL, respectively, and median time from hemoglobin measurement to transfusion was 6.1 hours vs 4.4 hours.

“Although the findings from our trial do not show a significant difference between the liberal and restrictive strategies, the possibility of smaller differences in benefit or harm that may be meaningful to patients and families is not excluded. Further meta-analyses of randomized trials may provide additional insight into appropriate practice,” the investigators wrote.

“In addition, refining patient-centered outcome measures to capture functional improvements is an important consideration for future studies in this population, especially when mortality benefit is unlikely,” they added.

The SAHARA authors had conducted an open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment. Seeking critically ill adults with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and anemia (hemoglobin 10.0 g/dL or lower) in the first 10 days after admission, they enrolled 742 people at 23 centers in Canada, Australia, and the U.S. This figure includes the initial 60 people enrolled during the pilot phase of the study.

Study participants had a mean age of 59.4 years and were 82% women — to be expected, since younger women are disproportionately affected by subarachnoid hemorrhage from intracranial aneurysm rupture.

The ruptured aneurysms in SAHARA were largely in the anterior circulation (87.2%) and mostly secured using the endovascular approach (60.5%). Patients were randomized on median day 3 after hospitalization.

Study interventions lasted a median 17 days in the liberal group and 16 days in the restrictive group, according to the researchers.

The primary endpoint, an unfavorable neurological outcome, was defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 4 or higher on a scale from 0 to 6.

Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of hospital stay all came out similar between the two study groups.

  • Nicole Lou is a reporter for MedPage Today, where she covers cardiology news and other developments in medicine. Follow

Disclosures

SAHARA was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Medical Research Futures Fund of Australia, and an investigator award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation.

English disclosed no other relevant ties to industry.

Co-authors reported relationships with industry, governmental entities, and healthcare organizations.

Primary Source

New England Journal of Medicine

Source Reference: English SW, et al “Liberal or restrictive transfusion strategy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage” N Engl J Med 2024; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2410962.



share Paylaş facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

A photo of a Black woman posing for a photo while holding a sign that reads, "Stop overdose." Others hold signs behind her.
Hit Hard by Opioid Crisis, Black Patients Further Hurt by Barriers to Care – KFF Health News
Chicken quesadillas
Understand the symptoms of depression during pregnancy
A computer rendering of Blastomyces fungus.
CDC Issues Final Report in Blastomycosis Outbreak
Hearing Loss and PD Risk Mitigated by Early Hearing Aid Use
Roivant to Stop Lung Disease Drug Development After Trial Failure
Here Are The 17 Of The Most Famous Athletes Ever — I Bet You Can't Name Them
Here Are The 17 Of The Most Famous Athletes Ever — I Bet You Can’t Name Them
A white cross stands in green grass, adorned with candles and other memorial objects. Beside the cross is a sign that reads, "Pray for Parkland."
Little Tracking, Wide Variability Permeate the Teams Tasked With Stopping School Shootings – KFF Health News
Headline Horizon | © 2024 | News